Homemade face masks can help limit the spread of coronavirus – but they do have downsides, according to a new study.
Seven types of face masks were put to the test by the University of Edinburgh, including surgical masks, respirators, lightweight and heavy-duty face shields, and handmade masks.
Aside from those with a valve, all of the face coverings were found to reduce the forward distance travelled by an exhaled breath by at least 90%.
Measurements were taken from people wearing different face coverings from people standing or lying down, as well as from a manikin connected to a cough-simulating machine.
A special type of imaging was used that enables scientists to detect the distance and direction travelled by the air that is expelled when someone coughs or breathes heavily.
Although the surgical and handmade masks did limit the forward flow of an outward breath, they also generated “far-reaching leakage jets to the side, behind and above and below” – with “intense backward jets” generated whenever someone was coughing or breathing heavily.
Full-face shields worn without a mask enabled “a strong downward jet” to be released.
Respirator masks, commonly used by workers exposed to fine dust, were also found to offer protection – but valves on these masks designed to make breathing easier “could potentially allow infectious air to spread considerable distances in front”.
Only masks that form a tight seal with the face were found to prevent the escape of virus-laden fluid particles, the researchers said.
When it comes to making a mask by hand, Britons are being urged to “ensure it seals gaps around the face, but be careful because making something that obstructs the mouth and nose is always dangerous”.
The University of Edinburgh says its findings could help steer official guidance on wearing masks to help tackle COVID-19, which can be spread in small droplets of moisture in people’s breath.