Skip to content
Monday, 2 November 2026Malta edition Malta-24 Briefing Newsletter @CDNewsDispatch
Malta's world news feed Local perspective with global outlook
CDE.NEWS The Dispatch
Subscribe
Netherlands

MH17 judges reject request to investigate alternative crash scenarios

epaselect epa04337924 Australian and Dutch investigators examine a piece of debris of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17 plane, near the village of Hrabove, 100 km from Donetsk, Ukraine, 01 August 2014. A group of international experts arrived 01 August at the site of the crash of Malaysia Airlines MH17 in eastern Ukraine after the government halted military operations against Russia-backed rebels. The Dutch government said members of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), as well as Australian and Dutch experts, had reached the scene of the crash, where up to 80 bodies could still be laying. Most of the victims on the plane, which is suspected of having been shot down by rebels on July 17, were Dutch, Malaysian and Australian. EPA/IGOR KOVALENKO

Judges hearing the case against four defendants in the 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine rejected on Wednesday a defence request for more time to investigate alternative explanations for the crash.

MH17 was flying from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur when it was shot down by a missile fired from territory held by pro-Russian rebels during fighting with Ukrainian government troops, international investigators say. All 298 people on board were killed, two-thirds of them Dutch nationals.

After years of collecting evidence, a Dutch-led international Joint Investigation Team (JIT) last year said the missile launcher used to hit the civilian airplane came from a Russian army base just across the border.

The Dutch government holds Moscow responsible, and three Russians and a Ukrainian are on trial for murder. None of the suspects are in custody. One, Russian Oleg Pulatov, is represented in court proceedings; the other three are being tried in absentia.

Russia has always denied involvement and has promoted a range of alternative theories, which the investigators rejected as unsupported by evidence.

Judge Hendrik Steenhuis said the defence had not provided a clear alternative scenario to investigate, while information on several other possible explanations was already part of the case file.

Steenhuis said the court would like to hear Pulatov in person, and would not submit written questions to him as his lawyers had requested.

He added the court would also like to hear from the other suspects — Russians Sergey Dubinsky and Igor Girkin, and Ukrainian Leonid Kharchenko — who have never cooperated with the court.

The court also called for a new questioning of witnesses who reported seeing the missile launcher on July 17, 2014, as well as the owner of the field from which the missile is believed to have been launched.

Judges also ruled that a new effort should be made to speak to the leader of Russia’s 53rd brigade, which has been identified by investigators as having transported the missile launcher.

The hearing of the case will resume on Feb 1, 2021.

Last month Russia abandoned discussions on liability for the crash with the Netherlands and Australia, saying the countries were not genuinely interested in establishing the truth and had launched legal proceedings against it.

(Reporting by Bart Meijer; Writing by Anthony Deutsch; Editing by Jon Boyle and Peter Graff)

Filed under NetherlandsUkraine

Leave a Reply

More from Netherlands

More →

The Malta-24 briefing, every weekday morning.

No widgets found. Go to Widget page and add the widget in Offcanvas Sidebar Widget Area.